The Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program

NSF
NSF
  • Home
  • The Program
    • NSF Noyce Program Directors
    • NSF Noyce Program Solicitation
    • Consider Becoming an NSF Noyce Principal Investigator
    • Become a Noyce Scholar or Teacher Leader
      • Noyce Scholar Profiles
      • Noyce Alumni Profiles
    • Voices From the Field Videos
  • Project Locator
    • Select from Map
    • Advanced Search
    • Submit Information
  • In the News
    • In the News
  • Meetings
    • 2022 Noyce Summit
    • 2021 Noyce Summer Events
    • 2020 Virtual Noyce Summit
    • Archived Noyce Summit Materials
    • Noyce Regional Meetings
  • Resources
    • Noyce Track 4 Research Book
    • Proposal Preparation Toolkit
    • Noyce Project Videos
    • Noyce Summit Abstract Catalogs
    • Reports
    • Toolkits
    • ARISE Research Community
  • Contact

The Importance of Field Supervisor Expertise in the Development of Highly-Qualified Science Educator

  • Year 2019
  • NSF Noyce Award # 1557384
  • First Name Salvatore
  • Last Name Garofalo
  • Institution Queens College, CUNY
  • Role/Position Co-PI
  • Workshop Category Track 4: Noyce Research
  • Workshop Disciplines Audience Other: Science Education
  • Target Audience Higher Education Institution Administrators, Project PIs / Co-PIs / Other Faculty/Staff, School and District Administrators
  • Topics Preparing Teachers for High-Need School Districts
  • Session Length 30 minutes
  • Additional Presenter(s)

    Stephen Farenga, sfarenga@qc.cuny.edu, Queens College, PI;
    Gopal Subramaniam, gopal.subramaniam@qc.cuny.edu, Queens College, Co-PI;
    David Laurenson, david.laurenson@qc.cuny.edu, Queens College, Project Director

Goals

1. To analyze whether receiving constructive criticism from multiple discipline-specific field supervisors/mentors increases the resiliency of science teacher candidates.
2. To explore the benefit of team field supervision for formative assessment of pedagogical and science-specific content knowledge and scaffolding of instructional and assessment strategies.

Evidence

The preliminary investigation gathered data on the efficacy of discipline-specific team supervisors on the development of highly trained science educators. The evidence includes field evaluations by science supervisors, cooperating teachers, and debriefing notes with science teacher education candidates. Additional evidence is provided by minutes from weekly meetings among field supervisors that explore comparative observations. In this study there was no manipulation of the environment or activities other than those manifested in the required feedback to teacher candidates during debriefing situations with mentor teachers.

Proposal

The purpose of this presentation is to elucidate observations from the field by full-time, discipline-specific team field science educators. Teachers are increasingly being evaluated by parents and administrators for tenure, merit pay, and promotion. The process of gathering external, unbiased observer feedback in regard to one’s instructional performance is therefore an invaluable experience for successful entry and retention within science education. It is evident based on the number of teachers who leave the field within the first three years that the usual pattern of teacher preparation and mentoring may not be efficient. We analyze whether receiving constructive criticism from multiple discipline-specific field supervisors/mentors increases the resiliency of science teacher candidates. This study also seeks to explore the benefit of team field supervision for formative assessment of pedagogical and science-specific content knowledge and scaffolding of instructional and assessment strategies. The development of teacher effectiveness requires comprehensive efforts of individuals who must understand teaching as a whole. Teaching and the evaluation of good teaching are probably some of the most complex human endeavors. Teacher preparatory programs aim to provide the beginning teacher with a repertoire of behaviors that extend beyond the basic area of teaching and learning in order to meet the variety of challenges present in the modern classroom. However, science education programs in particular must also provide meaningful discipline-specific pedagogical content knowledge covering a minimum of four distinct science subjects. Therefore, the science-specific background of the field supervisor is imperative to assess content complexity and appropriate content-specific pedagogical methodology.

What’s New

  • 2022 Noyce Summit
  • Noyce by the Numbers: 20 Years of Noyce
  • Proposal Preparation Webinars
  • Frequently Asked Questions for the Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program
  • Become a Noyce Scholar or Teacher Leader
  • Consider Becoming an NSF Noyce Principal Investigator
  • Noyce Alumni: Where Are They Now?

Check out our ARISE website for research & opportunities!

Checking In

NSF

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant Numbers DUE-2041597 and DUE-1548986. Any opinions, findings, interpretations, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of its authors and do not represent the views of the AAAS Board of Directors, the Council of AAAS, AAAS’ membership or the National Science Foundation.

AAAS

The World's Largest General Scientific Society

  • About Noyce Program
  • AAAS ISEED
  • Subscribe to ARISE
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
© 2023 American Association for the Advancement of Science