The Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program

NSF
NSF
  • Home
  • The Program
    • NSF Noyce Program Solicitation
    • Consider Becoming a NSF Noyce Principal Investigator
    • Consider Becoming a NSF Noyce Reviewer
    • Become a Noyce Scholar or Teacher Leader
      • Noyce Scholar Profiles
      • Noyce Alumni Profiles
    • Voices From the Field Videos
  • Project Locator
    • Select from Map
    • Advanced Search
    • Submit Information
  • In the News
    • In the News
  • Meetings
    • 2023 Noyce Summit
    • 2022 Noyce Summit
    • 2021 Noyce Summer Events
    • 2020 Virtual Noyce Summit
    • Archived Noyce Summit Materials
    • Noyce Regional Networks
  • Resources
    • Noyce Track 4 Research Book
    • Proposal Preparation Toolkit
    • Noyce Project Videos
    • Noyce Summit Abstract Catalogs
    • Reports
    • Toolkits
    • ARISE Research Community
  • Contact

Results from a Track 4 Research Project on Teacher Retention and Related Four Capitals

  • Year 2024
  • NSF Noyce Award # 2230997
  • First Name Adem
  • Last Name Ekmekci
  • Institution Rice University
  • Role/Position Principal Investigator (PI)
  • Proposal Type Workshop
  • Workshop Category Track 4: Noyce Research
  • Workshop Disciplines Audience STEM Education (general)
  • Target Audience Co-PIs, Evaluators/Education Researchers, Other Faculty/Staff, Project PIs
  • Topics Assessment/evaluation, Lessons learned from developing/implementing a Track 1 project / Track 2 project / Track 3 project / or Track 4 Research project
  • Additional Presenter(s)

    Mahtob Aqazade, Rebecca McGraw, Karen Renzaglia, Gregory Rushton, Michael Daley

Goals

Participants will learn about two instruments developed under this project: a survey instrument (adapted from previously developed scales and revalidated) that measures social, structural, human, and psychological capitals relating the teacher retention and interview protocols to explore teacher motivation for retention, teacher leadership, and social networks related to teaching and teacher leadership. Participants will also learn about different studies conducted under this grant that used these instruments and their findings.

Evidence

The instruments can be used in teacher education research and program evaluation. One study that used the survey instrument found that Master Teaching Fellows (MTFs) had higher levels of self-efficacy and diversity dispositions, larger teaching network size, greater teaching and leadership network proximity, and more bridging and energizing leadership network; and are more likely to shift to leadership positions than non-MTFs. In addition, higher level of leadership engagement, larger leadership network size, and lower degrees of teacher-school fit were associated with shifting to a leadership position in general. A study using interview protocols investigated how teachers defined teacher leadership. Teachers found collaboration, relationship with colleagues, administrators, and students, and school structure and roles to be important facilitators or barriers to teacher leadership. Another study explored how teacher leaders perceived teacher leadership and found that professional development of colleagues is central to the work of teacher leadership. Teacher leaders also found to be involved in school change and curriculum work. This study also found that engagement in a Noyce MTF program led to professional growth of teachers as teacher leaders in six areas: empowerment and confidence enhancement; self-awareness; connections, networking and collaboration; pedagogy and practice enrichment; increased credibility and expanded opportunities; and leadership skill development.

Proposal

Participants will learn the results of a three-year Track 4 research project exploring teacher leadership, identity, networks, and retention in relation to social, structural, personal, and psychological capitals. Comparisons were made between Master Teaching Fellows (MTFs) who participated in a Track 3 program between 2011 and 2020 in one of six different sites across the U.S. and non-MTFs (from the MTFs’ schools/districts) in relevant areas that include retention, leadership, and the impact of professional development on career trajectory. The study included both quantitative methods based on surveys, and qualitative methods based on extensive interviews. Four research groups focused on pertinent areas that contribute to the knowledge-base on retention, teacher leadership, social networks and career motivation and pathways. Studies included instrument validation; predicting retention through capital variables; comparing MTFs and non-MTFs in several aspects; exploring teacher and leader identity, power, and agency; defining teacher leadership; and social network analysis. Each group will share their research highlights which will be discussed in an interactive way with the audience.

What’s New

  • 2025 Noyce Summit
  • 2024 Noyce Summit
  • Proposal Preparation Webinars
  • Noyce PI Peer Webinars
  • Noyce Regional Networks
  • Noyce by the Numbers: 20 Years of Noyce
  • Frequently Asked Questions for the Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program
  • Become a Noyce Scholar or Teacher Leader
  • Consider Becoming a NSF Noyce Reviewer
  • Consider Becoming a NSF Noyce Principal Investigator
  • Noyce Alumni: Where Are They Now?

Check out our ARISE website for research & opportunities!

Checking In

NSF

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant Numbers DUE-2041597 and DUE-1548986. Any opinions, findings, interpretations, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of its authors and do not represent the views of the AAAS Board of Directors, the Council of AAAS, AAAS’ membership or the National Science Foundation.

AAAS

The World's Largest General Scientific Society

  • About Noyce Program
  • AAAS ISEED
  • Subscribe to ARISE
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
© 2026 American Association for the Advancement of Science