The Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program

NSF
NSF
  • Home
  • The Program
    • NSF Noyce Program Directors
    • NSF Noyce Program Solicitation
    • Consider Becoming an NSF Noyce Principal Investigator
    • Become a Noyce Scholar or Teacher Leader
      • Noyce Scholar Profiles
      • Noyce Alumni Profiles
    • Voices From the Field Videos
  • Project Locator
    • Select from Map
    • Advanced Search
    • Submit Information
  • In the News
    • In the News
  • Meetings
    • 2022 Noyce Summit
    • 2021 Noyce Summer Events
    • 2020 Virtual Noyce Summit
    • Archived Noyce Summit Materials
    • Noyce Regional Meetings
  • Resources
    • Noyce Track 4 Research Book
    • Proposal Preparation Toolkit
    • Noyce Project Videos
    • Noyce Summit Abstract Catalogs
    • Reports
    • Toolkits
    • ARISE Research Community
  • Contact

Teaching Science Literacy in the Age of Alternative Facts and Fake News

  • Year 2018
  • NSF Award #1540699
  • Registration Current Noyce Scholar

  • First Name Seth
  • Last Name Contreras

  • Discipline Biology
  • Institution Lewis University

Abstract

Every day people are bombarded by media reports involving scientific claims and medical findings. Facebook, other social media outlets, and the internet at large have enhanced the propagation of these reports, especially for teens. Many individuals accept what they read or hear as scientific fact without much thought and without examining the details through a critical lens. By training students to question media, including electronic, text, and multimedia sources, and to take a deeper look into them, science educators can train their students to be more savvy consumers of information in this digital media age. The application of critical pedagogy, in this case, refers to the set of skills and strategies that good readers and critical thinkers apply to carefully and thoughtfully examine texts or other media to verify or refute the information or message being conveyed. A model for examining a variety of media representations of science information, including news reports and articles, has been designed and tested with science students in several 8th and 9th grade science classroom settings. The data show that after critical literacy instruction, students in both grades were more likely to correctly identify an article as ‘fact,’ but less likely to correctly identify an article as ‘fiction.’ This is an important result because it demonstrates the importance of rigorously analyzing data to determine the efficacy of an instructional strategy, and also because it provides a robust basis for further research on this subject to investigate the causes of the discrepancy in these results.

What’s New

  • 2023 Noyce Summit
  • 2022 Noyce Summit
  • Noyce by the Numbers: 20 Years of Noyce
  • Proposal Preparation Webinars
  • Frequently Asked Questions for the Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program
  • Become a Noyce Scholar or Teacher Leader
  • Consider Becoming an NSF Noyce Principal Investigator
  • Noyce Alumni: Where Are They Now?

Check out our ARISE website for research & opportunities!

Checking In

NSF

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant Numbers DUE-2041597 and DUE-1548986. Any opinions, findings, interpretations, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of its authors and do not represent the views of the AAAS Board of Directors, the Council of AAAS, AAAS’ membership or the National Science Foundation.

AAAS

The World's Largest General Scientific Society

  • About Noyce Program
  • AAAS ISEED
  • Subscribe to ARISE
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
© 2023 American Association for the Advancement of Science