The Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program

NSF
NSF
  • Home
  • The Program
    • NSF Noyce Program Directors
    • NSF Noyce Program Solicitation
    • Consider Becoming an NSF Noyce Principal Investigator
    • Become a Noyce Scholar or Teacher Leader
      • Noyce Scholar Profiles
      • Noyce Alumni Profiles
    • Voices From the Field Videos
  • Project Locator
    • Select from Map
    • Advanced Search
    • Submit Information
  • In the News
    • In the News
  • Meetings
    • 2022 Noyce Summit
    • 2021 Noyce Summer Events
    • 2020 Virtual Noyce Summit
    • Archived Noyce Summit Materials
    • Noyce Regional Meetings
  • Resources
    • Noyce Track 4 Research Book
    • Proposal Preparation Toolkit
    • Noyce Project Videos
    • Noyce Summit Abstract Catalogs
    • Reports
    • Toolkits
    • ARISE Research Community
  • Contact

Grading Feedback and Mathematics Self-Efficacy

  • Year 2017
  • NSF Award #1340107
  • Registration Former Noyce Scholar

  • First Name Michael
  • Last Name King

  • Discipline Math
  • Institution Mills College
  • School Name and District Currently Teaching Oakland School for the Arts / Oakland Unified School District

Abstract

Four sixth-grade math classes were divided into ‘intervention’ and ‘control’ groups in a quasi-experimental research design intended to assess the effect on self-efficacy of alternative, understanding-based performance feedback. Bandura’s (1977) pioneering theory ofself-efficacy acts as the theoretical framework for the study. Thetheory posits that individuals persevere and apply constructive coping mechanisms when they hold an expectation of success. Lacking that expectation of success, individuals may exhibit defensive behavior or dysfunctional coping. Sources of self-efficacy include perceptions of past success and verbal persuasion, both of which are related to feedback given to students in the classroom, especially through grading. The study examines whether providing understanding-based feedback on tests and assignments, rather than traditional letter grades, can provide benefits to self-efficacy and finds evidence that it does. Students receiving understanding-based feedback had significantly higher self-efficacy survey scores than those receiving traditional letter grades. In addition, students receiving the intervention were more likely to speak of their performance in terms of their level of content understanding rather than merely in terms of performance ranking (‘good’or ‘bad’ performance).

What’s New

  • 2022 Noyce Summit
  • Noyce by the Numbers: 20 Years of Noyce
  • Proposal Preparation Webinars
  • Frequently Asked Questions for the Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program
  • Become a Noyce Scholar or Teacher Leader
  • Consider Becoming an NSF Noyce Principal Investigator
  • Noyce Alumni: Where Are They Now?

Check out our ARISE website for research & opportunities!

Checking In

NSF

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant Numbers DUE-2041597 and DUE-1548986. Any opinions, findings, interpretations, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of its authors and do not represent the views of the AAAS Board of Directors, the Council of AAAS, AAAS’ membership or the National Science Foundation.

AAAS

The World's Largest General Scientific Society

  • About Noyce Program
  • AAAS ISEED
  • Subscribe to ARISE
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
© 2023 American Association for the Advancement of Science