The Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program

NSF
NSF
  • Home
  • The Program
    • NSF Noyce Program Solicitation
    • Consider Becoming a NSF Noyce Principal Investigator
    • Consider Becoming a NSF Noyce Reviewer
    • Become a Noyce Scholar or Teacher Leader
      • Noyce Scholar Profiles
      • Noyce Alumni Profiles
    • Voices From the Field Videos
  • Project Locator
    • Select from Map
    • Advanced Search
    • Submit Information
  • In the News
    • In the News
  • Meetings
    • 2023 Noyce Summit
    • 2022 Noyce Summit
    • 2021 Noyce Summer Events
    • 2020 Virtual Noyce Summit
    • Archived Noyce Summit Materials
    • Noyce Regional Networks
  • Resources
    • Noyce Track 4 Research Book
    • Proposal Preparation Toolkit
    • Noyce Project Videos
    • Noyce Summit Abstract Catalogs
    • Reports
    • Toolkits
    • ARISE Research Community
  • Contact

The Evaluation of the NC High School Mathematics Master Teaching Fellows (NCHSMMTF) Program

  • Year 2024
  • NSF Noyce Award # 1852837
  • First Name Jamie
  • Last Name Gillespie
  • Registration Faculty/Administrator/Other
  • Discipline Mathematics
  • Role Other: Evaluator
  • Presenters

    Jamie Gillespie, The Friday Institute for Educational Innovation, NC State

Need

This evaluation provided formative data to the project leaders for decision-making and improvement of the program. It also assisted the project leaders in meeting the program’s reporting expectations.

Research Questions

*How effective is the program at preparing teachers to be master teachers and leaders? *How well does the Fellows program support its Fellows? *What impact does the Fellows program have on teacher effectiveness? *What impact does the Math Fellows program have on the retention of Fellows in teaching careers?

Approach

This evaluation used a utilization-focused design to collect and analyze data that project leaders needed and could use to make improvements to the program. Data collection included: •Survey – collected annually in the fall regarding the previous year •Classroom observations – completed annually in a rotation of classrooms •Interviews – Fellows were interviewed 3 of the 5 years and their principals were interviewed in year 5 •Completion of NBPTS certification – data collected by the program leaders •Completion of master’s degrees or graduate certificates – data collected by the program leaders. The survey asked Fellows to share their educational opinions, their instructional practices, how prepared they felt to teach specific topics, and what leadership activities they had engaged in. The classroom observations used the Instructional Quality Assessment (IQA) to score:•The rigor of the teacher’s questions •The rigor of the instructional tasks •The implementation of the tasks •The amount of student engagement •The quality of the mathematical discussions. In interviews, Fellows were asked how supported they felt by the program, whether they had noticed any changes to their instruction because of their participation, and whether they had noticed any impact of their participation on their students. They were also asked if they planned to stay in teaching.

Outcomes

*50% of Fellows earned NBPTS certification*100% of Fellows earned a Master’s of Mathematics Education or a graduate certificate in Teaching and Learning Mathematics *Increases in Fellows’ participation in leadership activities, including leading professional development in their schools/districts and presenting at conferences*Increases in Fellows’ use of specific instructional practices, including the Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices (NCTM) *Increases in Fellows’ performance on the IQA observation tool, specifically:–Increases in task potential to engage students in exploring and understanding the nature of mathematical concepts–Increases in the rigor of Fellows’ questions to their students–Increases in the extent to which students showed their work and explained their thinking–Increases in students’ engagement in class mathematical discussions

Broader Impacts

*Students in the schools where the Fellows teach will get high-quality mathematics instruction, leading to better understanding of mathematics. *The schools will benefit from having teacher leaders. *As the Fellows continue to share what they have learned with their colleagues, in the schools/districts and at conferences, they will contribute to improving the quality of mathematics instruction beyond their classrooms.

What’s New

  • 2025 Noyce Summit
  • 2024 Noyce Summit
  • Proposal Preparation Webinars
  • Noyce PI Peer Webinars
  • Noyce Regional Networks
  • Noyce by the Numbers: 20 Years of Noyce
  • Frequently Asked Questions for the Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program
  • Become a Noyce Scholar or Teacher Leader
  • Consider Becoming a NSF Noyce Reviewer
  • Consider Becoming a NSF Noyce Principal Investigator
  • Noyce Alumni: Where Are They Now?

Check out our ARISE website for research & opportunities!

Checking In

NSF

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant Numbers DUE-2041597 and DUE-1548986. Any opinions, findings, interpretations, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of its authors and do not represent the views of the AAAS Board of Directors, the Council of AAAS, AAAS’ membership or the National Science Foundation.

AAAS

The World's Largest General Scientific Society

  • About Noyce Program
  • AAAS ISEED
  • Subscribe to ARISE
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
© 2026 American Association for the Advancement of Science