The Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program

NSF
NSF
  • Home
  • The Program
    • NSF Noyce Program Directors
    • NSF Noyce Program Solicitation
    • Consider Becoming an NSF Noyce Principal Investigator
    • Become a Noyce Scholar or Teacher Leader
      • Noyce Scholar Profiles
      • Noyce Alumni Profiles
    • Voices From the Field Videos
  • Project Locator
    • Select from Map
    • Advanced Search
    • Submit Information
  • In the News
    • In the News
  • Meetings
    • 2022 Noyce Summit
    • 2021 Noyce Summer Events
    • 2020 Virtual Noyce Summit
    • Archived Noyce Summit Materials
    • Noyce Regional Meetings
  • Resources
    • Noyce Track 4 Research Book
    • Proposal Preparation Toolkit
    • Noyce Project Videos
    • Noyce Summit Abstract Catalogs
    • Reports
    • Toolkits
    • ARISE Research Community
  • Contact

Teacher Mentoring Project at Duke University

  • Year 2017
  • NSF Noyce Award # 1340044
  • First Name Kristen
  • Last Name Stephens
  • Discipline Other: Math and Science
  • Co-PI(s)

    Richard Hodel, Duke University, hodel@duke.edu
    Rochelle Schwartz-Bloom, Duke University, schwartz.bloom@duke.edu

  • Presenters

    Kristen Stephens, Duke University, kstephen@duke.edu

Need

New teachers often need support with curriculum planning, classroom management, and strategies for balancing life and work commitments. The project aims to provide a network of mentoring support for new teachers to increase the likelihood they will remain in the profession. The project responds to the empirical evidence that high quality mentors make a difference in retaining teachers and teachers placed in high poverty schools are more likely to leave the profession early (NCES, 2015).

Goals

The Goals of Duke’s Noyce Project are to
1. Recruit and enroll diverse cohorts of highly-qualified STEM graduates and professionals
2. Prepare teachers to improve student achievement in mathematics and the sciences
3. Support new teachers to teach in high-needs school districts
4. Continue longitudinal evaluation and analysis of project

This poster session will focus on outcomes for Goal 3. To address this goal, Duke has established a mentoring project that pairs Noyce Fellows in their first, second, or third year of teaching with Fellows in their fourth year or higher. Additional activities to support new teachers include: a bi-annual Noyce Learning Conference to reconnect Noyce graduates with faculty and colleagues; an online resource center to provide curricular resources to fellows; and annual travel awards to support fellows in their attendance and presentations at professional conferences.

Approach

Each mentee receives information (bios) on available mentors and select those mentors they feel are most closely suited to them. Mentees meet their mentors at the Noyce Learning Conference hosted by Duke. The mentees complete a needs matrix, which they analyze with their mentor. Based on this needs matrix, each mentee sets goals for the academic year. The mentor’s role is to support the mentee in meeting his or her goals by providing guidance and resources. Four focus groups are held each academic year (2 for mentors and 2 for mentees) to obtain feedback regarding mentor/mentee relationships and to determine additional supports that are needed. This feedback is critical in modifying aspects of the program to better address the needs of the fellows. Periodic surveys are also sent to mentors and mentees to collect information on the structure of each mentorship. For example, what tools do they use to connect with one another? With what frequency do they communicate.

Outcomes

We have learned the following: 1) A good mentoring program situates itself within the support network already available to the new teacher, and this will vary from teacher to teacher and over time–thus there is no one-size-fits-all mentoring model. 2) Data collection must be perceived as a valuable tool for reflection by the mentee rather than a burden. 3) long-distance mentors should help mentees identify and take advantage of supports available in the school/district. 4) Mentors should initiate contact and keep the lines of communication open to increase the mentee’s comfort with the relationship. 5) To the greatest extent possible, there should be opportunities for the mentor and mentee to observe one another in the classroom. In the upcoming school year, we plan to explore to incentivizing some of the project requirements, expand mentoring dyads to mentoring
networks, and launch a comprehensive recruitment effort to seek a more diverse group of mentors.

Broader Impacts

The hope is that the framework used to support the Noyce Mentoring project can be replicated by other organizations/institutions. In addition, we plan to continue to follow our Fellows longitudinally to better determine the extent to which their mentoring relationship influenced their decisions to remain in the profession and/or continue to teach at high-needs schools following their commitment to the program. All Noyce Fellows — current and past– have been impacted by this project. Though most mentoring programs tend to focus on the benefits to the mentee, it is quite possible that mentor/mentee relationships also positively impact mentors in their decisions regarding their teaching career. The use of past Noyce Fellows as mentors, provides us with an authentic way to maintain contact with our graduates and to continue to provide them a network of support following their commitment to the Noyce Program.

What’s New

  • 2023 Noyce Summit
  • 2022 Noyce Summit
  • Noyce by the Numbers: 20 Years of Noyce
  • Proposal Preparation Webinars
  • Frequently Asked Questions for the Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program
  • Become a Noyce Scholar or Teacher Leader
  • Consider Becoming an NSF Noyce Principal Investigator
  • Noyce Alumni: Where Are They Now?

Check out our ARISE website for research & opportunities!

Checking In

NSF

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant Numbers DUE-2041597 and DUE-1548986. Any opinions, findings, interpretations, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of its authors and do not represent the views of the AAAS Board of Directors, the Council of AAAS, AAAS’ membership or the National Science Foundation.

AAAS

The World's Largest General Scientific Society

  • About Noyce Program
  • AAAS ISEED
  • Subscribe to ARISE
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
© 2023 American Association for the Advancement of Science