The Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program

NSF
NSF
  • Home
  • The Program
    • NSF Noyce Program Directors
    • NSF Noyce Program Solicitation
    • Consider Becoming an NSF Noyce Principal Investigator
    • Become a Noyce Scholar or Teacher Leader
      • Noyce Scholar Profiles
      • Noyce Alumni Profiles
    • Voices From the Field Videos
  • Project Locator
    • Select from Map
    • Advanced Search
    • Submit Information
  • In the News
    • In the News
  • Meetings
    • 2022 Noyce Summit
    • 2021 Noyce Summer Events
    • 2020 Virtual Noyce Summit
    • Archived Noyce Summit Materials
    • Noyce Regional Meetings
  • Resources
    • Noyce Track 4 Research Book
    • Proposal Preparation Toolkit
    • Noyce Project Videos
    • Noyce Summit Abstract Catalogs
    • Reports
    • Toolkits
    • ARISE Research Community
  • Contact

Preservice Science Teachers’ Understanding of Principles of Reform-Based Science Instruction for Diverse Learners

  • Year 2019
  • NSF Noyce Award # 1557283
  • First Name Trish
  • Last Name Stoddart
  • Discipline Other: Science Teacher Preparation
  • Co-PI(s)

    Elisa Stone, University of California, Berkeley, emstone@berkeley.edu; Alan J. Daly, University of California, San Diego, ajdaly@ucsd.edu; Sandra J. Carlson, University of California, Davis, sjcarlson@ucdavis.edu; Julie A. Bianchini, University of California, Santa Barbara, jbianchi@ucsb.edu

  • Presenters

    Stacey L. Carpenter, University of California, Santa Barbara, scarpenter@education.ucsb.edu; Alexandria K. Hansen, California State University, Fresno, akhansen@mail.fresnostate.edu; Meghan Macias, University of California, Santa Barbara; meghanmacias@ucsb.edu; Erik Arevalo, University of California, Santa Barbara, erik_arevalo@ucsb.edu; Elisa M. Stone, University of California, Berkeley, emstone@berkeley.edu; Julie A. Bianchini, University of California, Santa Barbara, jbianchi@ucsb.edu

Need

The Science and Mathematics Teacher Research Initiative (SMTRI) is a Phase IV Noyce award that addresses a critical challenge in STEM education: how to prepare beginning secondary science and mathematics teachers to provide effective instruction to an increasingly culturally and linguistically diverse student population. The SMTRI project brings together researchers from six University of California (UC) campuses to examine the impact of a UC undergraduate STEM education program and graduate programs of teacher education on the development of beginning teachers’ knowledge, beliefs, and practices regarding reform-based instruction for culturally and linguistically diverse students. For the analysis presented here, we focused on preservice science teachers’ understanding of effective instruction for diverse learners.

Goals

We examined how preservice science teachers attended to principles of reform-based instruction for diverse learners over the course of their teacher education programs. Our specific research questions were: (1) What did preservice science teachers understand about engaging students in cognitively demanding work? (2) What did they understand about building on students’ funds of knowledge, providing students with opportunities for language production, and supporting students’ academic language in intersection with engaging students in cognitively demanding work?

Approach

Our conceptual framework was based on four interrelated principles of effective science instruction for diverse learners: (1) engaging students in cognitively demanding work, (2) building on students’ funds of knowledge and other resources, (3) providing students with language production opportunities, and (4) attending to academic language demands and providing academic language supports. We used these principles as an analytic framework¬ to determine what to look for regarding preservice teachers’ understanding of effective instruction for diverse learners. We qualitatively analyzed interview data from 28 preservice secondary science teachers from three teacher education programs (TEPs). The preservice teachers were interviewed twice: once toward the beginning of their TEPs and once at the end of their TEPs. We analyzed transcript data using two cycles of coding, establishing inter-coder reliability for both cycles.

Outcomes

We found that preservice teachers talked about engaging students in cognitively demanding work in general to specific ways. In their general descriptions of cognitively demanding work, preservice teachers talked about the importance of learning science by doing science or through inquiry and/or hands-on work. In contrast, in their more specific descriptions, they elaborated about the science and engineering practices in which they engaged students or in which students can and should engage. Further, we found that preservice teachers most frequently discussed the principle of providing language production opportunities in intersection with cognitively demanding work. They tended to discuss how students produced written and oral language associated with specific science and engineering practices, such as the practice of engaging in argument from evidence. Finally, we found that preservice teachers discussed the principle of building on students’ funds of knowledge and other resources in intersection with cognitively demanding work the least. When they did talk about students’ funds of knowledge and other resources, they sometimes did so in deficit ways.

Broader Impacts

This study addresses the critical challenge of how to prepare beginning science teachers to provide reform-based science teaching in culturally and linguistically diverse classrooms. We analyzed interview data to examine preservice science teachers’ understanding of four principles of reform-based science instruction for diverse learners. Our findings indicate areas where TEPs can better support preservice teachers, such as with building on and using students’ funds of knowledge. Our next steps include an examination of the similarities and differences among the three TEPs. This project was a collaboration among multiple institutions to collectively study science teacher education. Studies of teacher education are often small in scale and typically consist of case studies of individual courses. Thus, additional cross-case analyses of preservice teachers and TEPs will be valuable in generating findings that can more broadly impact teacher education policy and practice, especially regarding issues of equity and diversity in science teaching.

What’s New

  • 2022 Noyce Summit
  • Noyce by the Numbers: 20 Years of Noyce
  • Proposal Preparation Webinars
  • Frequently Asked Questions for the Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program
  • Become a Noyce Scholar or Teacher Leader
  • Consider Becoming an NSF Noyce Principal Investigator
  • Noyce Alumni: Where Are They Now?

Check out our ARISE website for research & opportunities!

Checking In

NSF

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant Numbers DUE-2041597 and DUE-1548986. Any opinions, findings, interpretations, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of its authors and do not represent the views of the AAAS Board of Directors, the Council of AAAS, AAAS’ membership or the National Science Foundation.

AAAS

The World's Largest General Scientific Society

  • About Noyce Program
  • AAAS ISEED
  • Subscribe to ARISE
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
© 2023 American Association for the Advancement of Science