The Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program

NSF
NSF
  • Home
  • The Program
    • NSF Noyce Program Directors
    • NSF Noyce Program Solicitation
    • Consider Becoming an NSF Noyce Principal Investigator
    • Become a Noyce Scholar or Teacher Leader
      • Noyce Scholar Profiles
      • Noyce Alumni Profiles
    • Voices From the Field Videos
  • Project Locator
    • Select from Map
    • Advanced Search
    • Submit Information
  • In the News
    • In the News
  • Meetings
    • 2022 Noyce Summit
    • 2021 Noyce Summer Events
    • 2020 Virtual Noyce Summit
    • Archived Noyce Summit Materials
    • Noyce Regional Meetings
  • Resources
    • Noyce Track 4 Research Book
    • Proposal Preparation Toolkit
    • Noyce Project Videos
    • Noyce Summit Abstract Catalogs
    • Reports
    • Toolkits
    • ARISE Research Community
  • Contact

How Two Approaches to Authentic Research Translate to Learning and Professional Gains for Teachers

  • Year 2022
  • NSF Noyce Award # 1758497
  • First Name Karen
  • Last Name Renzaglia
  • Discipline Biological Sciences
  • Co-PI(s)

    David Gibson

  • Presenters

    Renee Lopez Swalls, Laxmi Sagwan-Barkdoll, William Browning, Ingrid Felsl, David Gibson, & Karen Renzaglia, Southern Illinois University Carbondale

Need

Inquiry instruction is an evidence-based approach to successful STEM teaching that leads to gains in knowledge and understanding of science. Few studies have assessed the impact of different approaches to authentic research engagement on teachers. In this study, we engaged 14 Master Teaching Fellows (MTFs) in two original research projects, one during a summer research immersion (open-inquiry) and the second a course-based research experience (structured-inquiry).

Goals

We addressed two questions in this work. What differences in learning gains were there in the two approaches? What differences do teachers perceive between the two research experiences in their professional growth as educators?

Approach

To better enrich our understanding of the research problem, we used a mixed methods approach (qualitative and quantitative data) to compare the outcomes of the two research experiences. Pre- and post-tests were used to assess STEM content gains. Self-assessments included open-ended surveys and comparative quantitative instruments designed to identify aspects of the two approaches that were of value for teacher professional development.

Outcomes

Master Teaching Fellows made significant gains in content knowledge during both experiences with greater gains for the course-based approach compared with research immersion. Overall, teachers preferred the summer research immersion (open inquiry) because they felt ownership and investment in the research project and their students would benefit due to their enhanced ability to translate process skills into classroom practices. MTFs identified benefits from course-based research (structured inquiry) that include greater confidence in using lab instrumentation and greater understanding of science knowledge. High school teachers perceived more gains from the summer research immersion, while special education teachers perceived more gains from the course-based research.

Broader Impacts

We conclude that both experiences, summer research immersion (open-inquiry) and course-based research (structured-inquiry) are valuable for STEM teachers with each offering complementary but different benefits. These findings provide insight on what type of research experience best fits the design of teacher professional development initiatives like the NSF Robert Noyce MTF Program.

URLs

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8Pdmnqiydj1SeuzmPemg9w

What’s New

  • 2022 Noyce Summit
  • Noyce by the Numbers: 20 Years of Noyce
  • Proposal Preparation Webinars
  • Frequently Asked Questions for the Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program
  • Become a Noyce Scholar or Teacher Leader
  • Consider Becoming an NSF Noyce Principal Investigator
  • Noyce Alumni: Where Are They Now?

Check out our ARISE website for research & opportunities!

Checking In

NSF

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant Numbers DUE-2041597 and DUE-1548986. Any opinions, findings, interpretations, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of its authors and do not represent the views of the AAAS Board of Directors, the Council of AAAS, AAAS’ membership or the National Science Foundation.

AAAS

The World's Largest General Scientific Society

  • About Noyce Program
  • AAAS ISEED
  • Subscribe to ARISE
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
© 2023 American Association for the Advancement of Science