The Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program

NSF
NSF
  • Home
  • The Program
    • NSF Noyce Program Directors
    • NSF Noyce Program Solicitation
    • Consider Becoming an NSF Noyce Principal Investigator
    • Become a Noyce Scholar or Teacher Leader
      • Noyce Scholar Profiles
      • Noyce Alumni Profiles
    • Voices From the Field Videos
  • Project Locator
    • Select from Map
    • Advanced Search
    • Submit Information
  • In the News
    • In the News
  • Meetings
    • 2022 Noyce Summit
    • 2021 Noyce Summer Events
    • 2020 Virtual Noyce Summit
    • Archived Noyce Summit Materials
    • Noyce Regional Meetings
  • Resources
    • Noyce Track 4 Research Book
    • Proposal Preparation Toolkit
    • Noyce Project Videos
    • Noyce Summit Abstract Catalogs
    • Reports
    • Toolkits
    • ARISE Research Community
  • Contact

A Comparison of STEM vs. non-STEM Majors as Career Changer Teachers in the Middle School Math and Science Classroom

  • Year 2017
  • NSF Noyce Award # 1540623
  • First Name Lienne
  • Last Name Medford
  • Discipline Other: middle level
  • Co-PI(s)

    Barbara Speziale, Clemson, bjspz@clemson.edu

  • Presenters

    Lienne Medford, Clemson,, Lienne@clemson.edu
    Michelle Fowler, Clemson, mefowler@greenville.k12.sc.us

Need

This project responds to a gap in the research that examines the differences in success between STEM and non-STEM middle level math and science teachers. It looks at how background and preparation affect teacher and K-12 student success. This project benefits NSF as it provides information about what types of teacher preparation programs and candidates may experience the most success in the public schools.

Goals

We gathered data in a longitudinal student comparing STEM and non-STEM career changers. We gathered data based on interviews and then based on interviewees’ K-12 student scores.

Approach

Survey was sent to all available STEM and non-STEM graduates of program who were still teaching in middle schools. A stratified sampling was done to choose survey respondents to interview. Data shows clear success of both STEM and non-STEM program graduates compared to state K-12 student averages. Research was conducted by PI and doctoral student funded by grant.

Outcomes

Data shows that program graduates in longitudinal study are doing for better than the state average in both math and science standardized K-12 test scores. Now that research has been completed, we are moving on to dissemination and writing.

Broader Impacts

The impact of the project seems to be to show that career changers overall produce good results in the classroom. Further research may be required, but program graduates, both STEM and non-STEM, have higher scores than the state average in both math and science. It might encourage NSF to fund more MAT-type programs. Several proposals have been sent out to present findings, including one for this conference.

What’s New

  • 2022 Noyce Summit
  • Noyce by the Numbers: 20 Years of Noyce
  • Proposal Preparation Webinars
  • Frequently Asked Questions for the Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program
  • Become a Noyce Scholar or Teacher Leader
  • Consider Becoming an NSF Noyce Principal Investigator
  • Noyce Alumni: Where Are They Now?

Check out our ARISE website for research & opportunities!

Checking In

NSF

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant Numbers DUE-2041597 and DUE-1548986. Any opinions, findings, interpretations, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of its authors and do not represent the views of the AAAS Board of Directors, the Council of AAAS, AAAS’ membership or the National Science Foundation.

AAAS

The World's Largest General Scientific Society

  • About Noyce Program
  • AAAS ISEED
  • Subscribe to ARISE
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
© 2023 American Association for the Advancement of Science